Summary
For more than a year now, the war of words between William A. White and the government has been one of arcane legal arguments.
Did a racist's online rants amount to "true threats," as defined by federal law? Or did the words of White, a neo-Nazi leader, stop short of "inciting or producing imminent lawless action," and thus fall under the protection of the First Amendment?See the full content of this document
Extract
Neo-Nazi White's Trial Begins Today
When White's trial begins today in U.S. District Court in Roanoke, the debate over esoteric legalities will no doubt continue. But for the first time since White was charged with making online threats, the court will hear from his victims.
A nationally syndicated newspaper columnist from Maryland, a human rights lawyer from Canada, a university administrator from Delaware, a former small-town mayor from New Jersey and others have been subpoenaed to testify.The witnesses are expected to describe the fear they felt after get...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
